Regarding the 1.5°C, many people who need to pay attention to climate improvement or do low-carbon management in enterprises want to figure out what it means? It can do it? How does it work? The so-called 1.5°C is simply a goal of trying to control the global average temperature increase below 1.5°C above the pre-industrial level, and then continuously track, inspect and manage all actions and the general term for the entire process of achieving the goal. This includes not only the overall planning and arrangements at the national level, but also entities such as big cities and enterprises and factories of various sizes, but also have to participate! The key link is to calculate the greenhouse gases emitted from various channels in the monitoring range first. The types of greenhouse gases are not young, such as carbon dioxide and methane, and the first step is to measure the data accurately! After you have figured out where to place the sewage? We need to compare the internationally recognized standards or emission reduction targets set by ourselves based on actual conditions to see if there are any reductions as planned and the reduction is not in place? From time to time, you have to evaluate the effectiveness of the evaluation. After the evaluation, in some cases, you need to disclose your progress and results internally and externally. On the one hand, you can also supervise each other. This is the basic situation of the whole thing. Of course, many professional tools and technologies, related hardware equipment and software systems must be used during the monitoring process, and necessary technical support! , I forgot to say that it provides global procurement services for weak current intelligent products! The acquisition of many equipment required for monitoring is also very smooth. If you need it, you can learn about it, or it is a good reference when purchasing related accessories.
1. Choosing the right measurement tools and methods is a very critical first step. If this is not done well, it won’t work! If you pick the wrong one, the entire data will be inaccurate. Then you will not know exactly how much you have emitted, and you will not be able to conduct compliance checks based on the 1.5°C target. We have to think about our actual situation. Is it a large factory or a small enterprise? The industries are different and the characteristics of emission sources are also different. Use sensors or models to estimate? Or use the two together? All of these must be considered carefully!
2. Then accurately collect, record and store the monitoring data, which is also a particularly important step! It’s not possible to measure it. You have to ensure that the number is correct. You can’t remember it wrong today and forget it tomorrow. We need to form a fixed process, when to record, who will record, where to record, whether to use paper notes or use spreadsheets or special software systems? There must be clear regulations, otherwise, how to analyze and use these data to measure whether it meets the 1.5°C requirement.
3. There is also data analysis, and you cannot simply look at a few numbers. You have to find experienced people, those who are knowledgeable, or use appropriate software to analyze the trends and problem points hidden in these data. For example, the data in a certain quarter suddenly became much higher. Why? Is the equipment abnormal or is there any changes in the production process? You have to understand the deep management issues or technical improvements that may be needed.
What problems are usually common when implementing 1.5°C? Let's pick a few and ask and answer:
Question 1: What should I do if the company invests too much at the beginning? Answer: Don’t think about putting all the emission sources into high-tech testing equipment at one go. You can first take a basic inventory and choose some key emissions (that is, the emissions account for a large amount of the total volume and can be monitored relatively easily. Yes, for example, large boilers and various trucks in factories), use a lower cost method first. It is also good to use a material balance algorithm or an estimation method using emission factors. First, put the racks on and start monitoring. After that, with the initial foundation and progress, I have a little budget to make money and have clarified the situation. I will slowly improve and add new things a little!
Question 2: Different countries and regions have different rules and standards, which is too terrible. I can’t figure out which one to listen to? This is really worrying! You can try it first by looking for internationally recognized, commonly used, or widely recognized standards. This is better! For example, the standards related to carbon emission accounting and approval in ISO standards (such as ISO 14064 and ISO 50001 are of reference value! ISO is not the International Organization for Standardization). First, do these things that everyone is more acceptable, at least there will be no particularly large deviation. After that, let’s consider these local specific small parts that are more specific and detailed, so that it will be easier to do it step by step. For example, the EU may have an EU ETS system, and our country also has relevant rules for pilot projects in various places. This is a problem of adaptation in specific implementation under a large framework. Is it the premise to set a big foundation first?
A simple comparison of companies of different sizes or types is as follows: the first is that there are many products (large output), super old equipment, and high-severe pollution. This type of super-large, giant factories and mining units are of high concentration! The range of monitoring they need is generally very wide, and of course the difficulty is definitely high, and the investment is impossible. From energy (such as power generation, coal, gasoline, and emerging hydrogen energy, to the entire production chain (the production process is very complicated, one by one, one by one, and every small link may have emission points, such as the high temperature melting process of steelmaking furnaces), the instruments and equipment must be calibrated frequently; the second type is a little better, but it is also considered medium-sized, relatively ordinary (but you have to figure it out well) those service-oriented companies or processing trade-oriented companies. What office buildings and shopping malls are relatively "focused" on those fixed major energy-consuming equipment. The main common ones are, such as the large number of heating and air conditioning units that are opened in the middle of winter, the electricity consumption of daily offices, and the fuel consumption of occasionally company vehicles. Data collection is also relatively simple? The cost is also small. Yes, you may be able to complete the preliminary data report by the company's property management department or a dedicated part-time environmental protection staff (or occasionally by the safety management position) and summarize and report it.
Personally, no, it is just based on my personal one-sided unsystematic idea. 1.5°C is really, too, too critical to the sustainable and beautiful development of the earth's environment now and in the future. It is simply over a thousand pounds! Every organization and group of large and small organizations that really want to take on social responsibilities, and hope to take the long-term green, sustainable, healthy and live and develop in the long run. Whether you are happy or not, you should really take the initiative, hurry up and without any discounts, and do it steadily and seriously immediately and do it seriously and don’t mess with the appearance of those useless and meaningless flowers. Isn’t this an easy part that can be easily delayed and skipped? Then you have to grab it quickly!
Leave a Reply