In the field of building automation systems, that is, BAS, the closed nature of proprietary protocols has long restricted system integration and upgrade flexibility. Open protocols, with their interoperability and vendor neutrality, are transforming into an option for critical infrastructure in modern smart buildings. In this article, we will conduct an in-depth discussion of the actual value of open protocol alternatives, the path to implementation, and the trends that will emerge in the future.
Why open protocols are so important to BAS
The proprietary BAS protocol limits users to a single supplier ecosystem. Any expansion of functions or replacement of equipment must be restricted by original manufacturer support. This dependence will lead to high maintenance costs and upgrade obstacles during the life cycle of the system. Especially when the original supplier changes the technical route or terminates support for old products, the entire system may face the risk of obsolescence.
Open protocols that have established unified data communication standards, such as KNX and KNX, enable equipment from different manufacturers to work together on the same network. This means that owners are free to choose the most cost-effective sensor, actuator or controller, and upgrade the system in steps according to actual needs. This flexibility greatly enhances the long-term value of investment.
How open protocols reduce BAS total cost of ownership
When you first start investing, in a very competitive market, open protocol equipment usually has a better price than proprietary products. What is even more critical is that within a five-year or longer operating cycle, maintenance and upgrades do not require high fees for proprietary technology services. Owners can select multiple integrators to conduct bidding activities, thereby achieving the purpose of controlling long-term operating expenses.
When the system is expanded, the open protocol gives it permission to gradually add new functional modules without the need to completely replace the original infrastructure. For example, the newly added energy management module has the ability to communicate with the existing equipment used for HVAC control, thus avoiding the additional engineering costs of repeated wiring and the interoperability of old and new systems. This modular evolution greatly reduces the risks associated with technology iterations.
Differences from application in BAS
It is specially designed for building automation. It defines a rich variety of object types and services, which can completely describe the operating status and control logic of complex equipment such as air conditioning units and lighting circuits. It supports multiple physical media such as IP network and MS/TP bus, and is suitable as a building-level backbone communication protocol to achieve deep integration between subsystems.
The protocol has a simple structure and small resource overhead. It is often used to connect devices such as sensors and electricity meters at the field level. It has a long history in the field of industrial control, and its reliability has been fully verified. In BAS, it often exists as a supplementary protocol at the device level. It collects various metering data and then uploads it to the backbone network to form a hierarchical communication architecture.
How to migrate a proprietary BAS system to an open protocol
Before migrating, conduct a thorough audit of the existing system to identify closed links in proprietary protocols and what standardized components can be retained. Generally speaking, the replacement cost of terminal equipment such as actuators and sensors is relatively low, so they can be replaced with open protocol products first. At the controller level, a gradual transition can be achieved by adding protocol gateways, thereby avoiding the risk of one-time production shutdown.
The proposal given in the implementation paragraph is to use a parallel operation strategy, that is, to build a new open protocol network step by step while retaining the operation of the original system. After verifying the stability of the new system through data comparison, control will be switched by region. This kind of "dual-track" migration ensures the continuity of building operations to the greatest extent and provides global procurement services for weak current intelligent products!
How to ensure the security of open protocol BAS
People often misunderstand that open protocols are less secure than proprietary systems. In fact, standardized protocols are more conducive to the security community's centralized review and vulnerability repair. (/SC) has added TLS encryption and certificate authentication mechanisms to ensure that communication links are protected from eavesdropping and tampering. Regularly updating device certificates has become an important part of security management.
Consider an effective security practice as physical network separation, using firewalls to isolate the office IT network from the BAS communication network, allowing only necessary controlled data to be exchanged. At the same time, role-based access control is carried out to provide operation and maintenance personnel with different levels of operation permissions, and tenant administrators are also given different levels of operation permissions to prevent system failures caused by unauthorized operations.
Will the future BAS technology trend be open or closed?
Internet of Things technology promotes the comprehensive evolution of BAS in the direction of IP, and API interfaces based on Web services are gradually becoming a new open standard direction. This shows that in the future, building systems will not only be able to communicate with internal devices, but also securely interact with external services such as cloud analysis platforms and power grid demand response systems to achieve a truly intelligent ecological interconnection state.
Proprietary protocols will not disappear immediately, but they will slowly retreat to some special high-performance application scenarios. The mainstream market will form a hybrid architecture with open standards as the backbone and multiple protocols existing at the same time. Owners should give priority to systems that support standard interfaces. Even if they are currently using a proprietary solution, they must ensure that it has a technical path to migrate toward open standards.
When you are considering upgrading your building automation system, what is the most priority evaluation factor? Is it the equipment cost expenditure in the initial stage, the flexibility demonstrated during long-term operation and maintenance, or the level of docking capabilities with future smart city platforms? You are welcome to share your own opinions in the comment area. If this article is helpful to you, please give it a like to support it and share it with more peers.
Leave a Reply